Activated FGFR2 signalling as a biomarker for selection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients candidate to FGFR targeted therapies.

FGFR inhibitors have been developed to inhibit FGFR activation and signal transduction; notwithstanding, currently the selection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) patients for these drugs only relies on the detection of FGFR2 genetic alterations (GAs) in tumor tissues or circulating tumor DNAs, without concomitant assessment of FGFR2 signalling status. Accordingly, we performed multi-omic analyses of FGFR2 genes and FGFR2 signalling molecules in the tissue samples from 36 iCCA naïve patients. Gain-of-function FGFR2 GAs were detected in 7 patients, including missense mutations (n = 3; p.F276C, p.C382R and p.Y375C), translocations (n = 1) and copy number gain (n = 4; CNV ≥ 4). In contrast, among 29 patients with wild-type FGFR2, 4 cases showed activation of FGFR2 signalling, as they expressed the FGFR2 ligand FGF10 and phosphorylated FGFR2/FRS2α proteins; the remaining 25 cases resulted negative for activated FGFR2 signalling, as they lacked FGFR2 (n = 8) or phosphorylated FRS2α (n = 17) expression. Overall, we found that activation of FGFR2 signalling occurs not only in iCCA naïve patients with FGFR2 GAs, but also in a subgroup carrying wild-type FGFR2. This last finding entails that also this setting of patients could benefit from FGFR targeted therapies, widening indication of these drugs for iCCA patients beyond current approval. Future clinical studies are therefore encouraged to confirm this hypothesis.

FGFR-targeted therapeutics: clinical activity, mechanisms of resistance and new directions.

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling via FGF receptors (FGFR1-4) orchestrates fetal development and contributes to tissue and whole-body homeostasis, but can also promote tumorigenesis. Various agents, including pan-FGFR inhibitors (erdafitinib and futibatinib), FGFR1/2/3 inhibitors (infigratinib and pemigatinib), as well as a range of more-specific agents, have been developed and several have entered clinical use. Erdafitinib is approved for patients with urothelial carcinoma harbouring FGFR2/3 alterations, and futibatinib and pemigatinib are approved for patients with cholangiocarcinoma harbouring FGFR2 fusions and/or rearrangements. Clinical benefit from these agents is in part limited by hyperphosphataemia owing to off-target inhibition of FGFR1 as well as the emergence of resistance mutations in FGFR genes, activation of bypass signalling pathways, concurrent TP53 alterations and possibly epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related isoform switching. The next generation of small-molecule inhibitors, such as lirafugratinib and LOXO-435, and the FGFR2-specific antibody bemarituzumab are expected to have a reduced risk of hyperphosphataemia and the ability to overcome certain resistance mutations. In this Review, we describe the development and current clinical role of FGFR inhibitors and provide perspective on future research directions including expansion of the therapeutic indications for use of FGFR inhibitors, combination of these agents with immune-checkpoint inhibitors and the application of novel technologies, such as artificial intelligence.

A signature of five 7-methylguanosine-related genes is a prognostic marker for lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Background: N7-methylguanosine (m7G) is an important posttranscriptional modification affecting mRNA and tRNA functions and stability. The genes regulating the m7G process have been previously found involved in the carcinogenesis process. We aimed to analyze the role of m7G-related genes as potential prognostic markers for lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Methods: Twenty-nine m7G-related genes were selected for the analysis in the LSCC cohort of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to evaluate the predictive value of risk model developed with m7G signature for overall survival (OS).. The Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were performed for high- and low-risk LSCC groups. Results: We identified 17 differentially expressed m7G methylation-related genes in LSCC versus normal tissues. The expression of five m7G-related genes (EIF3D, LSM1, NCBP2, NUDT10, and NUDT11) was identified as an independent prognostic marker for OS in LSCC patients. A risk model with these five m7G-related genes predicted 2-, and 3-year survival rates of 0.623 and 0.626, respectively. The risk score significantly correlated with OS: LSCC patients with a higher risk score had shorter OS (P<0.01) and it was associated with lower immune response (P<0.01). Conclusions: We developed a novel m7G-related gene signature that can be of great utility to predict the prognosis for patients with LSCC.

Immune-Based Combination Therapies for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth most frequent cause of cancer-related death worldwide. HCC frequently presents as advanced disease at diagnosis, and disease relapse following radical surgery is frequent. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced HCC, particularly with the introduction of atezolizumab/bevacizumab as the new standard of care for first-line treatment. Recently, dual immune checkpoint blockade with durvalumab plus tremelimumab has also emerged as an effective first-line treatment for advanced HCC and most of the research is currently focused on developing combination treatments based mainly on ICIs. In this review, we will discuss the rationale and ongoing clinical trials of immune-based combination therapies for the treatment of advanced HCC, also focusing on new immunotherapy strategies such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) and anti-cancer vaccines.

Improvements in Systemic Therapies for Advanced Malignant Mesothelioma.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy associated with poor prognosis and a 5-year survival rate of 12%. Many drugs have been tested over the years with conflicting results. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current therapies in MPM and how to best interpret the data available on these drugs. Furthermore, we focused on promising treatments under investigation, such as immunotherapy with targets different from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, vaccines, target therapies, and metabolism-based strategies.

Mutational Landscape of Cholangiocarcinoma According to Different Etiologies: A Review.

Recent next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies on large cohorts of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients have clearly revealed the extreme intra- and inter-tumoral molecular heterogeneity that characterizes this malignancy. The lack of a stereotyped molecular signature in CCA makes the identification of actionable therapeutic targets challenging, making it mandatory to have a better understanding of the origin of such heterogeneity in order to improve the clinical outcome of these patients. Compelling evidence has shown that the CCA genomic landscape significantly differs according to anatomical subtypes and the underlying etiology, highlighting the importance of conducting molecular studies in different populations of CCA patients. Currently, some risk factors have been recognized in CCA development, while others are emerging from recent epidemiological studies. Nevertheless, the role of each etiologic factor in driving CCA genetic heterogeneity still remains unclear, and available studies are limited. In an attempt to shed more light on this issue, here we review the current literature data on the mutational spectrum of this disease according to different etiologies.

Are FGFR and IDH1-2 alterations a positive prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? An unresolved issue.

Despite representing some of the most common and investigated molecular changes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), the prognostic role of FGFR and IDH1/2 alterations still remains an open question. In this review we provide a critical analysis of available literature data regarding this topic, underlining the strengths and pitfalls of each study reported. Despite the overall poor quality of current available studies, a general trend toward a better overall survival for FGFR2 rearrangements and, possibly, for FGFR2-3 alterations can be inferred. On the other hand, the positive prognostic role of IDH1/2 mutation seems much more uncertain. In this scenario, better designed clinical trials in these subsets of iCCA patients are needed in order to get definitive conclusions on this issue.

Asbestos exposure as an additional risk factor for small duct intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a pilot study.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare malignancy, recently classified in small duct and large duct morphological subtypes. Growing evidence suggests asbestos as a putative risk factor for iCCA, albeit no correlation between asbestos and iCCA morphology has been investigated so far. The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between asbestos exposure and iCCA morphological subtype. Forty patients with surgically removed iCCA were prospectively enrolled: asbestos exposure was assessed according to the Italian National Mesothelioma Register questionnaire. From the surgical iCCA specimens the main histopathological variables were collected, including the small duct (sd-iCCA, 32 patients) and large duct subtypes (ld-iCCA, 8 patients). Five sd-iCCA cases had a definite/probable occupational exposure to asbestos, while no cases of ld-iCCA were classified as being occupationally exposed (definite/probable). Other kind of asbestos exposure (i.e. possible occupational, familial, environmental) were recorded in 16 sd-iCCA and 3 ld-iCCA. Cases with unlikely exposure to asbestos were 11 sd-iCCA (35.5%) and 5 ld-iCCA (62.5%). In conclusion, these findings seem to indicate that sd-iCCA might be more frequently associated to asbestos exposure rather than ld-iCCA, suggesting that asbestos fibres might represent a parenchymal, rather than a ductal risk factor for iCCA. This pilot study must be confirmed by further case-control studies or large independent cohorts.

BARX2/FOXA1/HK2 axis promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression and energy metabolism reprogramming.

Background: Metabolic reprogramming is an emerging cancer feature that has recently drawn special attention since it promotes tumor cell growth and proliferation. However, the mechanism of the Warburg effect is still largely unknown. This research aimed to reveal the effects of BarH-like homeobox 2 (BARX2) in regulating tumor progression and glucose metabolism in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Methods: Expression of BARX2 was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in LUAD cell line and tissues, and the tumor-promoting function of BARX2 in LUAD cells was detected in vitro and in vivo xenograft models. The metabolic effects of BARX2 were examined by detecting glucose uptake, the production levels of lactate and pyruvate, and the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay and luciferase reporter gene assay were used to identify the underlying molecular mechanism of BARX2 regulation of HK2. Further studies showed that transcription factor FOXA1 directly interacts with BARX2 and promotes the transcriptional activity of BARX2. Results: BARX2 was remarkably up-regulated in LUAD tissues and positively linked to advanced clinical stage and poor prognosis. In vitro and in vivo data indicated ectopic expression of BARX2 enhanced cell proliferation and tumorigenesis, whereas BARX2 knockdown suppressed these effects. Metabolic-related experiments showed BARX2 promoted the reprogramming of glucose metabolism. Mechanistically, the BARX2/FOXA1/HK2 axis promoted LUAD progression and energy metabolism reprogramming. Conclusions: In summary, our research first defined BARX2 as a tumor-promoting factor in LUAD and that it may act as a novel prognostic biomarker and new therapeutic target for the disease.

Targeting STT3A produces an anti-tumor effect in lung adenocarcinoma by blocking the MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.

Background: Glycosylation is crucial for the stability and biological functions of proteins. The aberrant glycosylation of critical proteins plays an important role in multiple cancers, including lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). STT3 oligosaccharyltransferase complex catalytic subunit A (STT3A) is a major isoform of N-linked glycosyltransferase that catalyzes the glycosylation of various proteins. However, the functions of STT3A in LUAD are still unclear. Methods: The expression profiles of STT3A were initially analyzed in public data sets and then validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blot and immunohistochemistry assays in clinical LUAD samples. The overall survival (OS) between patients with high and low STT3A expression was compared using a Kaplan-Meier curve with a log-rank analysis. STT3A was knocked-out using CRISPR/Cas9 and inhibited by NGI-1. Cell Counting Kit-8, colony formation assay, wound-healing, transwell assay, and flow cytometry were performed to assess the cellular functions of STT3A in vitro. A mice xenograft model was established to investigate the effects of STT3A on tumor growth in vivo. Further, the downstream signaling pathways of STT3A were screened by mass spectrometry with a bioinformatics analysis, and the activation of the target pathways were subsequently validated by Western blot. Results: The expression of STT3A was frequently upregulated in LUAD tissues than normal lung tissues. The high expression of STT3A was significantly associated with poor OS in LUAD patients. The knockout or inhibition of STT3A suppressed proliferation, migration, and invasion, and arrested the cell cycle of LUAD cell lines in vitro. Similarly, the knockout or inhibition of STT3A suppressed tumor growth in vivo. In terms of molecular mechanism, STT3A may promote LUAD progression by activating the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase and protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) pathways and regulating the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Conclusions: STT3A promotes LUAD progression via the MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways and could serve as a novel prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target for LUAD patients.

Intensive Follow-Up Program and Oncological Outcomes of Biliary Tract Cancer Patients after Curative-Intent Surgery: A Twenty-Year Experience in a Single Tertiary Medical Center.

AIM: The aim of this research was to assess the impact of an intensive follow-up program on BTC patients who had received surgery with curative intent at a tertiary referral hospital. METHODS: BTC patients were followed-up every three months during the first two years after their first surgery and every six months from the third to the fifth post-operative year. RESULTS: A total of 278 BTC patients who received R0/R1 surgery were included. A total of 17.7% of patients underwent a second surgery following disease relapse, and none of these patients experienced additional disease relapse. CONCLUSIONS: An intensive follow-up after surgical resection may help in the early identification of disease relapse, leading to early treatment and prolonged survival in selected cases.

Exposure to Asbestos and Increased Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Risk: Growing Evidences of a Putative Causal Link.

To date the true global incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and the underlying risk factors remain to be fully defined, in particular, the role of occupational and environmental factors. Currently, the putative role of asbestos exposure as a risk factor for iCCA is gaining increased attention in the international scientific community and agencies. In this commentary we review and integrate available epidemiological and mechanistic evidences that support a potential role of asbestos exposure in iCCA etiology.

Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: Why Do We Keep Failing? A Focus on Tumor Immune Microenvironment, Predictive Biomarkers and Treatment Outcomes.

The advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapies has dramatically changed the outcomes of patients affected by many malignancies. Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains one the few tumors that is not treated with new generation therapies, as chemotherapy still represents the only effective therapeutic strategy in advanced-stage disease. Agents aiming to reactivate the host immune system against cancer cells, such as those targeting immune checkpoints, failed to demonstrate significant activity, despite the success of these treatments in other tumors. In many cases, the proportion of patients who derived benefits in early-phase trials was too small and unpredictable to justify larger studies. The population of PC patients with high microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficiency is currently the only population that may benefit from immunotherapy; nevertheless, the prevalence of these alterations is too low to determine a real change in the treatment scenario of this tumor. The reasons for the unsuccess of immunotherapy may lie in the extremely peculiar tumor microenvironment, including distinctive immune composition and cross talk between different cells. These unique features may also explain why the biomarkers commonly used to predict immunotherapy efficacy in other tumors seem to be useless in PC. In the current paper, we provide a comprehensive and up-to-date review of immunotherapy in PC, from the analysis of the tumor immune microenvironment to immune biomarkers and treatment outcomes, with the aim to highlight that simply transferring the knowledge acquired on immunotherapy in other tumors might not be a successful strategy in patients affected by PC.

Predictive Biomarkers for Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Immunotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Where Do We Stand?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the sixth most commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide, still representing an important cause of cancer-related death. Over the next few years, novel systemic treatment options have emerged. Among these, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been widely evaluated and are under assessment, as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents in treatment-naïve and previously treated patients. In particular, the approval of the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab plus the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab as front-line treatment for advanced HCC has led to the adoption of this combination in this setting, and the IMbrave 150 phase III trial has established a novel standard of care. However, several questions remain unanswered, including the identification of reliable predictors of response to ICIs in HCC patients. In the current paper, we will provide an updated overview of potentially useful predictive biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in advanced HCC. A literature search was conducted in September 2021 of Pubmed/Medline, Cochrane library and Scopus databases.

Nivolumab: an investigational agent for the treatment of biliary tract cancer.

Introduction: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) include four uncommon primary biliary malignancies characterized by poor prognosis: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and ampulla of Vater cancer. To date, the available therapeutic options are limited; nevertheless, with the advent of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, the treatment scenario is constantly changing, opening toward future possibilities for the personalized treatment of BTC. Among these treatments, nivolumab is currently being investigated in BTC.Areas covered: This review provides a comprehensive overview of the recent progress and future perspectives of immunotherapy for the treatment of BTC, with a particular focus on nivolumab, which has demonstrated its effectiveness in many malignancies and is in its initial phase of evaluation in BTC.Expert opinion: BTCs are not among those tumors that demonstrated remarkable sensitivity to immunotherapy, such as melanoma or non-small-cell lung cancer. However, the results obtained with nivolumab are not disappointing if we analyze the population of the trials testing its efficacy, including pretreated patients, unselected for PD-L1 expression and with different BTCs. In our opinion, ICIs such as nivolumab could fill an empty spot in the treatment of selected BTC patients, especially in combination with other agents, and the results of ongoing clinical trials are awaited.

Targeting BRAF-Mutant Biliary Tract Cancer: Recent Advances and Future Challenges.

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) represent a heterogeneous group of aggressive solid tumors with limited therapeutic options, and include gallbladder cancer (GBC), ampulla of Vater cancer (AVC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA). METHODS & RESULTS: In the current review, we will discuss recent results of clinical trials testing targeted therapies in BRAF-mutant BTCs, with a particular focus on the recently published Phase II ROAR trial and ongoing active and recruiting clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Although the extended use of molecular profiling has paved the way toward a new era in BTC management, targeted therapies are limited to iCCA so far, and the prognosis of patients with metastatic disease has substantially not changed in the last decade. In this discouraging scenario, BRAF inhibition is currently emerging as a novel treatment option in patients harboring BRAF mutations.

The (Eternal) Debate on Microwave Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in BCLC-A Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: While percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is considered the standard ablative modality for the treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) is being increasingly used in recent years. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare percutaneous MWA versus percutaneous RFA in BCLC-A HCC across randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible studies included RCTs assessing MWA versus RFA in BCLC-A HCC. Outcomes of interest included: complete ablation (CA) rate, local recurrence (LR) rate, 1-year overall survival (OS) rate, 3-year OS rate and major complications rate. RESULTS: We retrieved all the relevant RCTs through PubMed/Medline, Cochrane library and EMBASE; five eligible studies involving a total of 794 patients (MWA: 409; RFA: 385) and 1008 nodules of HCC (MWA: 519; RFA: 489) were included in our analysis. No significant differences were found between MWA and RFA regarding CA, LR, 3-year OS and major complications rate. Regarding 1-year OS, a higher rate was observed in the MWA group. CONCLUSION: MWA and RFA are effective and safe techniques in early stage, BCLC-A, HCCMWA resulted in better 1-year OS, although this benefit was not confirmed in the 3-year analysis.